![]() ![]() FAA withdrew Part 101 subpart E.Ĭurrently, recreational fly according to 49 U.S.C. Do NOT rely on Part 101 as it is no longer valid law. Recreational pilots used to fly under 14 CFR Part 101 but the laws changed. The recreational drone laws have been in flux where the regulations were created, and the law changed, but the old regulations stayed on the books. Overview of the Laws Recreational Drone Test On, the FAA withdrew Part 101 subpart E as a regulation because it caused confusion and was overruled by 9 which came from the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018. The FAA Re-Authorization Act of 2018 unfortunately repealed the law that allowed recreational drones to be very unregulated but made it law that institutions of higher education could fly under recreational drone laws for educational or research purposes. There was no drone license requirement for recreational drone flyers at this time. Part 107 explains how to obtain a drone license for non-recreational flying while Part 101 was for recreational flyers. Eventually, in 2015 a notice of proposed rule-making was published and on August 29, 2016, Part 101 and Part 107 became law. The FAA had been working on some commercial drone regulations since 2009 but didn’t make it a priority. In May 2016, the FAA issued an interpretation that educational institutions could fly under the recreational category. Recreational flying remained largely unchanged during this time. These exemptions at least made commercial drone operations somewhat workable to do but were still plagued with the requirement to have a sport pilot license which could cost $$$ to obtain and the requirement to stay at least 500 feet away from the property you didn’t own and people not participating in your operation. Later in September of 2014, the FAA issued some exemptions under the FRMA’s Section 333 (now called Section 44807). This had beneficial provisions for recreational and non-recreational flyers. In February 2012, the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 was passed. ![]() The by-product of this policy statement was it essentially made commercial drone flying financially unreasonable if you wanted to do it legally, because you would have to comply with all the Federal Aviation Regulations which were originally designed for manned aircraft. AC 91-57 only applies to modelers, and thus specifically excludes its use by persons or companies for business purposes.” This is where the line started being drawn very deeply in the sand between recreational flyers and non-recreational flyers. ![]() The FAA then published the infamous 2007 policy statement which declared “that people and companies other than modelers might be flying UAS with the mistaken understanding that they are legally operating under the authority of 91-57.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |